James E. Blair wrote:
> [...]
> When I look at the two of those, I have to admit that it's the second
> one I find more intuitive and I'm pretty sure I'll end up calling it
> 'sahara-specs' in common usage no matter the name.

+1

Also the program "codename" is actually defined in programs.yaml:

http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml

It generally matches the name of the main project, but could potentially
be different, in corner cases.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to