For everyone's awareness, Alexis proposed a spec related to this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94910
-Ben On 05/20/2014 05:05 PM, James Polley wrote: > I spoke to JP offline and confirmed that the link to 85418 should have been > a link to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88252 > > I think that > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-incubator-rationalise-ui and > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-devtest.sh-refactoring-blueprintare > the closest things to documentation we've got about this. Now that we > have the specs repo, perhaps we should be creating a spec and moving the > discussion there. > > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Sullivan, Jon Paul < > jonpaul.sulli...@hp.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> There are a number of reviews[1][2] where new environment variables are >> being disliked, leading to -1 or -2 code reviews because new environment >> variables are added. It is looking like this is becoming a policy. >> >> >> >> If this is a policy, then could that be stated, and an alternate mechanism >> made available so that any reviews adding environment variables can use the >> replacement mechanism, please? >> >> >> >> Otherwise, some guidelines for developers where environment variables are >> acceptable or not would equally be useful. >> >> >> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/85009 >> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/85418 >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> ,: jonpaul.sulli...@hp.com J *Cloud Services - @hpcloud* >> (: +353 (91) 75 4169 >> >> >> >> Postal Address: Hewlett-Packard Galway Limited, Ballybrit Business Park, >> Galway. >> >> Registered Office: Hewlett-Packard Galway Limited, 63-74 Sir John >> Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2. >> >> Registered Number: 361933 >> >> >> >> The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential >> and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error >> you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the sender. >> >> >> >> To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise stated, you >> should consider this message and attachments as "HP CONFIDENTIAL". >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
