I agree to continue work on bp/ nova-api-test-inheritance. As its reduce the duplication code and later will help to remove the V2 tests easily. V2.1 tests can be written on same design of inheritance.
-- Thanks Ghanshyam Mann On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Kenichi Oomichi <oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>wrote: > Hi David, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 6:49 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Status of v3 tests in tempest > > > > It seems the nova team decided in Atlanta that "v3" as currently > > understood is never going to exist: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-v3-api. > > > > There are a number of patches in flight that tweak how we handle > > supporting both v2/v3 in tempest to reduce duplication. > > We need to decide what to do about this. At a minimum, I think we should > > stop any work that is inspired by any v3-related activity > > except to revert any v2/v3 integration that was already done. We should > > really rip out the v3 stuff that was recently added. I know Matt had > > some concern about that regarding testing v3 in stable/icehouse but > > perhaps he can say more. > > I agree to stop new Nova v3 tests and disable Nova v3 tests in > the gate for icehouse. > and I hope we continue working for reducing duplication between > Nova v2/v3 tests on bp/ nova-api-test-inheritance. Because it > would be nice for v2.1 API tests also for avoiding duplication > between v2/v2.1 tests also. > > > Thanks > Ken'ichi Ohmichi > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev