Reminder that the first meeting will kick off today at 1500 UTC on #openstack-meeting-3 Please add agenda items to the etherpad if you wish to discuss them this week:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda Regards, Daniel On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:10:40PM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Hi Nova developers, > > Since Nova already has sub-teams for HyperV, VMWare, and XenAPI, I feel that > it would be a worthwhile effort to introduce a sub-team + meeting for the > Nova Libvirt driver: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova#Nova_subteams > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Libvirt > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda > > I have arbitrarily picked Tuesdays at 1500 UTC on IRC #openstack-meeting-3 > as the time + place for the meeting. If this turns out to be horrible for > a significant number of people, we can discuss alternate times (as long as > they are not friday evenings ;-), or alternate between 2 times. Currently > this time point works out as > > 08:00 San Francisco > 11:00 Boston > 15:00 UTC > 16:00 London > 17:00 Berlin > 20:30 Mumbai > 23:00 Bejing > 24:00 Tokyo > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=15&min=00&sec=0p1=0 > > So I suggest the first meeting take place next week: > > Tuesday May 20th at 15:00 UTC > > I don't want to add bureaucracy to the libvirt driver development workflow. > Rather I intend that this meeting is a way to facilitate libvirt related > discussions between different parties/companies and to resolve roadblocks > that people working on libvirt may be facing. It should also be a place for > other OpenStack teams (Neutron/Glance/Infra/etc) to come to meeting the > Nova libvirt team and raise topics they have. > > > If you want to attend this meeting, please record topics for discussion > in the etherpad (and put your name + IRC nick against items) > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda > > > Historically KVM / QEMU have got the majority of attention from libvirt > developers, to the extent that we (unfortunately) caused breakage of both > LXC and Xen during Icehouse. From mail and design summit discussions, it > seems there is a critical mass of people interested in raising the quality > of LXC and Xen during Juno and getting gate CI up & running. So I think > this meeting would be a good place for those interested in Libvirt LXC & > Xen support to coordinate their initial efforts / planning. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
