> > >> HA-Proxy version 1.4.24 2013/06/17 What was the reason this approach >> was dropped? >> > > IIRC the major reason was that having 2 services on same port (but > different interface) would be too confusing for anyone who is not aware > of this fact. > > Major part of documentation for haproxy with vip setup is done with duplicated ports. >From my experience lb solutions have been made with load balancer sitting on VIRTUAL_IP:STANDART_PORT and/or PUBLIC_VIRTUAL_IP:STANDART_PORT.
Maybe this is not so big issue? It will be much easier to start with such deployment configuration Dmitry
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
