Hi All, 

Totally agree with Allamaraju. Only hierarchical administrative boundary is not 
enough, the definition of internal network architecture within one domain is 
very important. The networking among projects in one domain could be isolated 
or not, the access to external network may be not only controlled at domain 
level, but also at project level. Allamaraju's proposal can solve these issues 
well.

My question is how to solve multi-region scenario?  May the VPC cross multiple 
OpenStack instances?

The role for different resources visibility is also need to be defined for the 
VPC solution.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang( Joe Huang)


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Allamaraju, Subbu [mailto:su...@subbu.org] 
发送时间: 2014年5月13日 20:55
收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical administrative boundary [keystone]

Hi Arvind,

This seems to be covering one of the use cases listed by 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-VPC. Others to isolate between VPCs 
include shared resources like networks, images, roles, and other configuration. 

Subbu

On May 8, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Tiwari, Arvind <arvind.tiw...@hp.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>  
> Below is my proposal to address VPC use case using hierarchical 
> administrative boundary. This topic is scheduled in Hierarchical 
> Multitenancysession of Atlanta design summit.
>  
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Hierarchical_administrative_boundary
>  
> Please take a look.
>  
> Thanks,
> Arvind
>  
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to