On May 10, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikano...@mirantis.com>
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
> I think you had a chance to hear this argument yourself (from several
> different core members: Mark McClain, Salvatore Orlando, Kyle Mestery) on
> those meetings we had in past 2 months.
> I was advocating 'loadbalancer' (in it's extended version) once too,
> receiving negative opinions as well.
> In general this approach puts too much of control of a backend to user's
> hands and this goes in opposite direction than neutron project.
>
> If it's just about the name of the root object - VIP suits this role too, so
> I'm fine with that. I also find VIP/Listeners model a bit more clearer per
> definitions in our glossary.
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene.
I was in those meetings Eugene and was read the irc logs of the two I
missed and was of the impression they were open to discussion.I'll defer this
topic until the summit.
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
