Hi Clay,
First of all, thanks for the reply.

1. How can I update the eventlet version. I installed swift from source (git). Pulling the latest code helps? 2. Yes. Recently my clients changed to chunked encoding for transfer. Are you saying chunked encoding is not supported by swift?
3. Yes, the 408s have made it to the clients from proxy servers.

Regards,
Shyam

On Friday 09 May 2014 10:45 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
I thought those tracebacks only showed up with old versions of eventlet or and eventlet_debug = true?

In my experience that normally indicates a client disconnect on a chucked encoding transfer request (request w/o a content-length). Do you know if your clients are using transfer encoding chunked?

Are you seeing the 408 make it's way out to the client? It wasn't clear to me if you only see these tracebacks on the object-servers or in the proxy logs as well? Perhaps only one of the three disks involved in the PUT are timing out and the client still gets a successful response?

As the disks fill up replication and auditing is going to consume more disk resources - you may have to tune the concurrency and rate settings on those daemons. If the errors happen consistently you could try running with background consistency processes temporarily disabled and rule out if they're causing disk contention on your setup with your config.

-Clay


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com <mailto:openst...@nemebean.com>> wrote:

    This is a development list, and your question sounds more
    usage-related.  Please ask your question on the users list:
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

    Thanks.

    -Ben


    On 05/09/2014 06:57 AM, Shyam Prasad N wrote:

        Hi,

        I have a two node swift cluster receiving continuous traffic
        (mostly
        overwrites for existing objects) of 1GB files each.

        Soon after the traffic started, I'm seeing the following
        traceback from
        some transactions...
        Traceback (most recent call last):
           File "/home/eightkpc/swift/swift/proxy/controllers/obj.py",
        line 692,
        in PUT
             chunk = next(data_source)
           File "/home/eightkpc/swift/swift/proxy/controllers/obj.py",
        line 559,
        in <lambda>
             data_source = iter(lambda:
        reader(self.app.client_chunk_size), '')
           File "/home/eightkpc/swift/swift/common/utils.py", line
        2362, in read
             chunk = self.wsgi_input.read(*args, **kwargs)
           File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py",
        line 147,
        in read
             return self._chunked_read(self.rfile, length)
           File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py",
        line 137,
        in _chunked_read
             self.chunk_length = int(rfile.readline().split(";",
        1)[0], 16)
        ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: '' (txn:
        tx14e2df7680fd472fb92f0-00536ca4f0) (client_ip: 10.3.0.101)

        Seeing the following errors on storage logs...
        object-server: 10.3.0.102 - - [09/May/2014:01:36:49 +0000] "PUT
        
/xvdg/492/AUTH_test/8kpc/30303A30323A30333A30343A30353A30396AEF6B53000000007B000000.2.data"
        408 - "PUT
        
http://10.3.0.102:8080/v1/AUTH_test/8kpc/30303A30323A30333A30343A30353A30396AEF6B53000000007B000000.2.data";
        "txf3b4e5f677004474bbd2f-00536c30d1" "proxy-server 12241"
        95.6405 "-"

        It's success sometimes, but mostly 408 errors. I don't see any
        other
        logs for the transaction ID. or around these 408 errors in the log
        files. Is this a disk timeout issue? These are only 1GB files
        and normal
        writes to files on these disks are quite fast.

        The timeouts from the swift proxy files are...
        root@bulkstore-112:~# grep -R timeout /etc/swift/*
        /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:client_timeout = 600
        /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:node_timeout = 600
        /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:recoverable_node_timeout = 600

        Can someone help me troubleshoot this issue?

        --
        -Shyam


        _______________________________________________
        OpenStack-dev mailing list
        OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
        <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
        http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



    _______________________________________________
    OpenStack-dev mailing list
    OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
    <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to