Just to expand a bit on this, flavors are supposed to be the lowest level of 
granularity,
and the general idea is to round to the nearest flavor (so if you have a VM 
that requires
3GB of RAM, go with a 4GB flavor).  Hence, in my mind, it doesn't make any 
sense to create
flavors on the fly; you should have enough flavors to suit your needs, but I 
can't really
think of a situation where you'd need so much granularity that you'd need to 
create new
flavors on the fly (assuming, of course, that you planned ahead and created 
enough flavors
that you don't have VMs that are extremely over-allocated).

Best Regards,
Solly Ross

----- Original Message -----
From: "Serg Melikyan" <smelik...@mirantis.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2014 2:18:21 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Heat] Custom Nova Flavor creation through 
Heat (pt.2)

> Having project-scoped flavors will rid us of the identified issues, and will 
> allow a more fine-grained way of managing physical resources. 

Flavors concept was introduced in clouds to solve issue with effective physical 
resource usage: 8Gb physical memory can be effectively splitted to two 
m2.my_small with 4Gb RAM or to eight m1.my_tiny with 1 GB. 

Let's consider example when your cloud have only 2 compute nodes with 8GB RAM: 
vm1 (m1.my_tiny) -> node1 
vm2 (m1.my_tiny) -> node1 
vm3 (m2.my_small) -> node1 
vm4 (m2.my_small) -> node2 (since we could not spawn on node1) 

This leaves ability to spawn predictable 2 VMs with m1.my_tiny flavor on node1, 
and 2 VMs m1.my_tiny or 1 VM m2.my_small on node2. If user has ability to 
create any flavor that he likes, he can create flavor like mx.my_flavor with 
3GB of RAM that could not be spawned on node1 at all, and leaves 1GB under-used 
on node2 when spawned there. If you will multiply number of nodes to 100 or 
even 1000 (like some of the OpenStack deployments) you will have very big 
memory under-usage. 

Do we really need to have ability to allocate any number of physical resources 
for VM? If yes, I suggest to make two ways to define number of physical 
resource allocation for VMs: with flavors and dynamically. Leaving to cloud 
admins/owners to decide which way they prefer they cloud resources to be 
allocated. Since small clouds may prefer flavors, and big clouds may have 
dynamic resource allocation (impact from under-usage will be not so big). As 
transition plan project-scoped flavors may do the job. 


On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Dimitri Mazmanov < 
dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com > wrote: 



This topic has already been discussed last year and a use-case was described 
(see [1]). 
Here's a Heat blueprint for a new OS::Nova::Flavor resource: [2]. 
Several issues have been brought up after posting my implementation for review 
[3], all related to how flavors are defined/implemented in nova: 


    * Only admin tenants can manage flavors due to the default admin rule in 
policy.json. 
    * Per-stack flavor creation will pollute the global flavor list 
    * If two stacks create a flavor with the same name, collision will occur, 
which will lead to the following error: ERROR (Conflict): Flavor with name 
dupflavor already exists. (HTTP 409) 
These and the ones described by Steven Hardy in [4] are related to the flavor 
scoping in Nova. 

Is there any plan/discussion to allow project scoped flavors in nova, similar 
to the Steven’s proposal for role-based scoping (see [4])? 
Currently the only purpose of the is_public flag is to hide the flavor from 
users without the admin role, but it’s still visible in all projects. Any plan 
to change this? 

Having project-scoped flavors will rid us of the identified issues, and will 
allow a more fine-grained way of managing physical resources. 

Dimitri 

[1] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/018744.html 
[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Blueprints/dynamic-flavors 
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90029 
[4] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/019099.html 

_______________________________________________ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 




-- 
Serg Melikyan, Senior Software Engineer at Mirantis, Inc. 
http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com 

+7 (495) 640-4904, 0261 
+7 (903) 156-0836 

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to