On Fri, Apr 25 2014, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > I am not sure tho that forking oslo.common.policy is any better than > copy/pasting it with its dependences.
+1, forking is not an option. > I would suggest we move `swift-keystoneauth` to its own project part of the > swift umbrella projects to handle such things and be able to include those > policy module directly. > > I think we have enough swift core now that uses keystone everyday to > sponsors the core review for that project. I like that plan. :) -- Julien Danjou -- Free Software hacker -- http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
