On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Michael Still <mi...@stillhq.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > John originally mentioned this on the review, but Phil and I both seem > > to agree. > > > > Most novaclient work can just be a work item of a nova blueprint. How > > about we just handle it that way? > > For those cases where that's true I agree that's the way to go. > > > I don't really expect any major work in novaclient beyond basic support > > of new APIs. It seems that the major new work in this area is going > > into creating a common client. > > I don't think we should block the possibility of there being a > novaclient specific BP sometime in the future. When we think of a good > reason for one, let's just put it in a subdirectory. > > Sounds good to me. > Michael > > -- > Rackspace Australia > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
