Yeah, service type has internal meaning, I'd avoid using that term. Network service type probably is a bit of tautology, because we only offer network services :)
Eugene. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Alan Kavanagh <alan.kavan...@ericsson.com>wrote: > Think that's a good idea Jay > A slight twist perhaps: "Network Service Type" > > /Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] > Sent: April-23-14 11:29 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Flavor(?) Framework > > On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 19:24 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: > > Thanks, that can be an option. > > > Just wondering, can we find a single name? > > service type? :) > > Oh, I guess that's taken. Well, we could always rename the existing > service type to "service class" or "service family". > > Best, > -jay > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
