On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Dan Smith <d...@danplanet.com> wrote: >> Do we really want to -1 for spelling mistake in nova-specs? > > I do, yes. These documents are intended to be read by deployers and > future developers. I think it's really important that they're useful in > that regard. > >> This is really a bad news for non-native speaker like me because I'm >> really not sensitive to the spelling even after checking again and >> again. > > Well, I certainly understand it can be frustrating. When I do it, I > provide the proper spelling in my comment, and I think I've been > generally pretty responsive to re-reviewing things quickly when it was > just a spelling error. Usually, however, there is something else to go > wrong with the -1 so it needs to be respun anyway. > > --Dan
I just submitted a change to show how to set up sphinxcontrib-spelling for the nova-specs repository (https://review.openstack.org/88047). I didn't do the work to ensure that enchant is installed in the CI environment where the docs build, or to set up a CI job to run the spelling checker, but this would at least make it possible for spec authors to use the tool locally. See http://sphinxcontrib-spelling.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ for more details on configuration options and how to add a word list to the project for things you all agree are words that might not be in the system dictionary. Doug > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
