It would be incredibly useful to get some of the "packagers" into this conversation too.
Matt On 4/8/14 4:51 AM, "Steven Hardy" <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: >On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young <ayo...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in >>swift, >> >> ceilometer, tripleO and horizon. >> >> >> > >> > >> > Keystone would also be interested in user feedback, of course. >> >> >> Crossing openstack-dev threads [1] here, gathering feedback on proposed >> deprecations would be a great topic for such a session. >> >> [1] >> >>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/031652.html > >+1, I think a cross-project session on deprecation strategy/process would >be >hugely beneficial, particularly if we can solicit feedback from operators >and deployers at the same time to agree a workable process. > >Steve > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
