On Mon, Apr 07 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We can avoid adding to the problem by putting each new library in its > own package. We still want the Oslo name attached for libraries that > are really only meant to be used by OpenStack projects, and so we need > a naming convention. I'm not entirely happy with the "crammed > together" approach for oslotest and oslosphinx. At one point Dims and > I talked about using a prefix "oslo_" instead of just "oslo", so we > would have "oslo_db", "oslo_i18n", etc. That's also a bit ugly, > though. Opinions?
Honestly, I think it'd be better to not have oslo at all and use independent – if possible explicit – names for everything -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
