Ok, so we don't want to switch to UCA, let's consider this variant. What options do we have to make possible to run Ceilometer jobs with Mongo backend? I see only https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81001/ or making Ceilometer able to work with old Mongo. But the last variant looks inappropriate at least in Icehouse. What am I missing here? Maybe there is smth else we can do?
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch> wrote: > > > If UCA is required, what would be the upgrade path for a currently running > OpenStack Havana site to Icehouse with this requirement ? > > > > Would it be an online upgrade (i.e. what order to upgrade the different > components in order to keep things running at all times) ? > > > > Tim > > > > *From:* Chmouel Boudjnah [mailto:chmo...@enovance.com] > *Sent:* 18 March 2014 17:58 > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] > Ceilometer tempest testing in gate > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > > So I'm still -1 at the point in making UCA our default run environment > until it's provably functional for a period of time. Because working > around upstream distro breaks is no fun. > > > > I agree, if UCA is not very stable ATM, this os going to cause us more > pain, but what would be the plan of action? a non-voting gate for > ceilometer as a start ? (if that's possible). > > Chmouel > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
