Joe Gordon wrote: >> And this is a test with shedskin, I suppose that in more complicated >> dependecy scenarios it should perform better. >> >> [majopela@redcylon tmp]$ cat <<EOF >test.py >> > import sys >> > print "hello world" >> > sys.exit(0) >> > EOF >> >> [majopela@redcylon tmp]$ time python test.py >> hello world >> >> real 0m0.016s >> user 0m0.015s >> sys 0m0.001s > > This looks very promising! > > A few gotchas: > > * Very limited library support > https://code.google.com/p/shedskin/wiki/docs#Library_Limitations > * no logging > * no six > * no subprocess > > * no *args support > * https://code.google.com/p/shedskin/wiki/docs#Python_Subset_Restrictions
This certainly looks promising enough to do a more complete proof-of-concept around it. This adds packaging complexity and we are likely to have only a subset of features available, but it may still be worth it. I filed the following session so that we can discuss it at the summit: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/97 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
