Therve told me he actually tested this and it works. Now if I could only configure DevStack to install a working Neutron...
Regards, Mike From: "Fox, Kevin M" <kevin....@pnnl.gov> To: Chris Armstrong <chris.armstr...@rackspace.com>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, Date: 03/13/2014 02:19 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Hi Chris, That's great to hear. I'm looking forward to installing icehouse and testing that out. :) Thanks, Kevin From: Chris Armstrong [chris.armstr...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM To: Fox, Kevin M; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Hi Kevin, The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit support for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a resource that wraps up both a OS::Heat::Server and a PoolMember in a template and use it via a Stack resource. (Note that Mike was talking about the new OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup resource, not AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup). So, while I haven’t tested this case with PoolMember specifically, and there may still be bugs, no more feature implementation should be necessary (I hope). -- Christopher Armstrong IRC: radix On March 12, 2014 at 1:52:53 PM, Fox, Kevin M (kevin....@pnnl.gov) wrote: I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code changes as far as I can tell. I think its only a few days of work, but the OpenStack CLA is preventing me from contributing. :/ Thanks, Kevin From: Mike Spreitzer [mspre...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work? Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
