On 3/6/2014 2:20 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral RBD image support chain https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/ are still open after their dependency https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/ was merged. These should be low risk as: 1. We have been testing with this code in place. 2. It's nearly all contained within the RBD driver. This is needed as it implements an essential functionality that has been missing in the RBD driver and this will become the second release it's been attempted to be merged into. Andrew Mirantis Ceph Community _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
What would be awesome in Juno is some CI around RBD/Ceph. I'd feel a lot more comfortable with this code if we had CI running Tempest against that type of configuration, just like how we are now requiring 3rd party CI for virt drivers.
I realize this is tangential but it would make moving these blueprints through faster so you're not working on it over multiple releases.
Having said that, I'm not signing up for sponsoring this, sorry. :) -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
