On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:19:34AM +0100, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > On 27/02/14 11:52, Petr Blaho wrote: > > > I agree with you w/r/t to indirection when accessing data but I like the > > idea that when I look at json repsonse I see what type of resource it > > is. That wrapper element describes it. And I do not need to know what > > request (url, service, GET or POST...) triggered that output. > > That's data denormalization. What do you then do when the two sources of > information don't agree? Also, do you actually need the json at all > without knowing where it came from (not just from which api call, but > which system and at what time)? I can't imagine such a situation.
Yeah, I agree with you that not wrapped json data is better solution. I just liked how wrapped data looks. > > Finally, when you need to save a whole lot of json outputs and need to > know where they come from, you traditionally put that information in the > file name, no? > > -- > Radomir Dopieralski > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev My concern is that it looks like OpenStack does not have a "proper" way how to format output json in APIs and it is on behalf of each project. -- Petr Blaho, pbl...@redhat.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
