On 03/04/2014 05:00 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:11 -0800, Dan Smith wrote: >> Now, the actual concern is not related to any of that, but about whether >> we're going to open this up as a new thing we support. In general, my >> reaction to adding new APIs people expect to be stable is "no". However, >> I understand why things like the resource reporting and even my events >> mechanism are very useful for deployers to do some plumbing and >> monitoring of their environment -- things that don't belong upstream anyway. >> >> So I'm conflicted. I think that for these two cases, as long as we can >> say that it's not a stable interface, I think it's probably okay. >> However, things like we've had in the past, where we provide a clear >> plug point for something like "Compute manager API class" are clearly >> off the table, IMHO. > > How about using 'unstable' as a component of the entrypoint group? > E.g., "nova.unstable.events"…
Wouldn't that defeat the "point" of entry points ... immutable endpoints? What happens when an unstable event is deemed stable? > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
