On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:28:20 -0800 Dan Smith <d...@danplanet.com> wrote: > > > If we do go down this route of changing the v2 API like this, it > > would be nice to bump the minor version as well, so when a user has > > to distinguish between the two versions they don't have to say > > Havana V2 vs Icehouse V2, they can just say v2.1. > > Yes, I'm totally all for introducing versioning into v2. Definitely.
So if we make backwards incompatible changes we really need a major version bump. Minor versions don't cut it, because the expectation is you have API stability within a major version. How much do we like it when python libraries change semantic meaning of methods or remote methods with just a minor library version increment? Chris _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
