On 2/21/2014 1:53 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:53:11 +0000
Kenichi Oomichi <oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API in Icehouse
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500
Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:
Greetings,
The v3 API effort has been going for a few release cycles now.
As we approach the Icehouse release, we are faced with the
following question: "Is it time to mark v3 stable?"
My opinion is that I think we need to leave v3 marked as
experimental for Icehouse.
Although I'm very eager to get the V3 API released, I do agree with
you. As you have said we will be living with both the V2 and V3
APIs for a very long time. And at this point there would be simply
too many last minute changes to the V3 API for us to be confident
that we have it right "enough" to release as a stable API.
Through v3 API development, we have found a lot of the existing v2 API
input validation problems. but we have concentrated v3 API development
without fixing the problems of v2 API.
After Icehouse release, v2 API would be still CURRENT and v3 API would
be EXPERIMENTAL. So should we fix v2 API problems also in the
remaining Icehouse cycle?
So bug fixes are certainly fine with the usual caveats around backwards
compatibility (I think there's a few in there that aren't
backwards compatible especially those that fall into the category of
making the API more consistent).
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/APIChangeGuidelines
Chris
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
We also need to circle back to the issues/debates around what to do with
the related bug(s) and how to handle something like this in V2 now with
respect to proxying to neutron (granted that my premise in the last
comment may be off a bit now):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43822/
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
