On 02/14/2014 03:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > Thanks to a massive push this week, both the seed *and* undercloud > jobs are now passing on tripleo-gate nodes, but they are not yet > voting. > > I'd kind of like to get them voting on tripleo jobs (check only). We > don't have 2 clouds yet, so if the tripleo ci-cloud suffers a failure, > we'd have -1's everywhere. I think this would be an ok tradeoff (its > check after all), but I'd like -infra admin folks opinion on this - > would it cause operational headaches for you, over and above the > current risks w/ the tripleo-ci cloud? > > OTOH - we actually got passing ops with a fully deployed virtual cloud > - which is awesome. > > Now we need to push through to having the overcloud deploy tests pass, > then the other scenarios we depend on - upgrades w/rebuild, and we'll > be in good shape to start optimising (pre-heated clouds, local distro > mirrors etc) and broadening (other distros ...). > > Lastly, I'm going to propose a merge to infra/config to put our > undercloud story (which exercises the seed's ability to deploy via > heat with bare metal) as a check experimental job on our dependencies > (keystone, glance, nova, neutron) - if thats ok with those projects? > > -Rob >
My biggest concern with adding this to check experimental, is the
experimental results aren't published back until all the experimental
jobs are done.
We've seen really substantial delays, plus a 5 day complete outage a
week ago, on the tripleo cloud. I'd like to see that much more proven
before it starts to impact core projects, even in experimental.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
