> > I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I > propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC, > so that we give this new review's process some mileage.
+1, good idea On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org>wrote: > Dina Belova wrote: > > Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a > > review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set > a > > specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled. > > > > > > Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly speaking not > > all currently integrated projects fit all of them. > > Will be nice to find out all gaps there and fix them asap. > > Agreed. I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I > propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC, > so that we give this new review's process some mileage. > > So.. Nova, Cinder, Neutron ? > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Best regards, Dina Belova Software Engineer Mirantis Inc.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
