Mark Washenberger wrote: > I don't have any issue defining what I think of as typical extension / > variation seams in the Glance code base. However, I'm still struggling > to understand what all this means for our projects and our ecosystem. > Basically, why do I care? What are the implications of a 0% vs 100% > designation? Are we hoping to improve interoperability, or encourage > more upstream collaboration, or what? > > How many deployments do we expect to get the trademark after this core > definition process is completed?
Yes... what is the end goal ? I agree that's important (and influences a bit our response here). But that's a separate discussion, one I've started on the foundation ML: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2014-February/001620.html -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
