On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:36:05PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 01:19 +0900, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 02/05/2014 12:37 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > I do realize this would be a rather substantial shift from current > > approach, but current approach seems to be hitting a new complexity > > point that we're only just starting to feel the pain on. > > The issue at hand is that we've discovered that checking an > autogenerated file into git causes issues ... hardly the first time > we've learned that lesson.
It isn't the first time that the nova.conf.sample has caused us pain either. I've lost count of the number of times I've -1'd reviews because they messed up the config file during a rebase merge, or forgotten to update it, or had the re-generation tools fail silently and add a -1000 line diff that deletes the entire config file content. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
