Hi Sean, good idea, count me in! I think it makes more sense for me to help in Neutron, that's the project that I'm more familiar with.
Rossella On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Haiming Yang <laserjety...@gmail.com>wrote: > I think it is also good for general i18n effort > ------------------------------ > 发件人: Christopher Yeoh <cbky...@gmail.com> > 发送时间: 2014/1/28 11:02 > 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions)<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > 主题: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > >> On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote: >> > Hi Sean, >> > >> > I'm currently working on moving away from the "built-in" logging to use >> log_config=<filename> and the python logging framework so that we can start >> shipping to logstash/sentry/<insert other useful tool here>. >> > >> > I'd be very interested in getting involved in this, especially from a >> "why do we have log messages that are split across multiple lines" >> perspective! >> >> Do we have many that aren't either DEBUG or TRACE? I thought we were >> pretty clean there. >> >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > P.S. FWIW, I'd also welcome details on what the "Audit" level gives us >> that the others don't... :) >> >> Well as far as I can tell the AUDIT level was a prior drive by >> contribution that's not being actively maintained. Honestly, I think we >> should probably rip it out, because I don't see any in tree tooling to >> use it, and it's horribly inconsistent. >> >> > For the uses I've seen of it in the nova api code INFO would be perfectly > fine in place of AUDIT. > > I'd be happy to help out with patches to cleanup the logging in n-api. > > One other thing to look at - I've noticed with logs is that when something > like glanceclient code (just as an example) is called from nova, > we can get ERROR level messages for say image not found when its actually > perfectly expected that this will occur. > I'm not sure if we should be changing the error level in glanceclient or > just forcing any error logging in glanceclient when > called from Nova to a lower level though. > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev