On 01/21/2014 04:43 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Dugger, Donald D > <donald.d.dug...@intel.com <mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com>> wrote: > > OK, it looks like the concensus is that we don't try and keep the > gantt tree in sync with nova instead we: > > 1) Get the current gantt tree to pass unit tests > 2) Get gantt to pass integration tests (e.g. get it working as the > nova scheduler) > 3) Modify devstack to optionally use gantt > 4) Freeze scheduler changes to nova as we: > > > This should be covered the the standard feature freeze for Icehouse > > > a) Extract all the changes that were needed to get gantt working > b) Recreate the gantt tree from the current nova tree > c) Apply all the patches from step 4.a > 5) Unfreeze scheduler work but now all work is targeted exclusively > to the gantt tree > > > LGTM, although once we have a working gantt for Icehouse I think we > should have another round of discussion about deprecating nova-scheduler > in favor of gantt. On I high level that is something I think we all > support, but the devil is in the details.
Right, I don't think it's worth talking about until gantt is demonstrated to be working. Otherwise the deprecation path discussion is a moot point. It's really a switch I'd rather flip at the beginning of a release cycle, anyway. It seems quite likely that any deprecation cycle will start in Juno and not Icehouse at this point. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
