2014/1/20 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> > > > But I believe that the two concerns can be tackled separately. > > Indeed. I fully agree with the fact isolation can be provided by Nova, and Climate would by the way happy to leverage it for providing capacity planning on top of it. By the way, I'm personnally convicted that there are many Nova features that can be shared for other projects : scheduler (that's why I'm following Gantt progress), extensible resource tracker and tenancy isolation for objects. Scheduler followed his way having its own service, but maybe Oslo is the best path for the others (Climate is trying to follow what happens with model_query() and all the connected concerns (like for example the deleted flag which has no sense IMHO).
-Sylvain
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
