Hi. So while turbo hipster is new, I've been reading every failure message it produces to make sure its not too badly wrong. There were four failures posted last night while I slept:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64521 ============================ This one is a TH bug. We shouldn't be testing stable branches. bug/1265238 has been filed to track this. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61753 ============================ This is your review. The failed run's log is https://ssl.rcbops.com/turbo_hipster/logviewer/?q=/turbo_hipster/results/61/61753/8/check/gate-real-db-upgrade_nova_percona_user_001/1326092/user_001.log and you can see from the failure message that migrations 152 and 206 took "too long". Migration 152 took 326 seconds, where our historical data of 2,846 test migrations says it should take 222 seconds. Migration 206 took 81 seconds, where we think it should take 56 seconds based on 2,940 test runs. Whilst I can't explain why those migrations took too long this time around, they are certainly exactly the sort of thing TH is meant to catch. If you think your patch isn't responsible (perhaps the machine is just being slow or something), you can always retest by leaving a review comment of "recheck migrations". I have done this for you on this patch. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61717 ============================ This review also had similar unexplained slowness, but has already been rechecked by someone else and now passes. I note that the slowness in both cases was from the same TH worker node, and I will keep an eye on that node today. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56420 ============================ This review also had slowness in migration 206, but has been rechecked by the developer and now passes. It wasn't on the percona-001 worker that the other two were on, so perhaps this indicates that we need to relax the timing requirements for migration 206. Hope this helps, Michael On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: > Hi, > It seems that she/he is behaving oddly again. I have posted a patch that > does not have any database changes and it has give me a –1…. > Happy new year > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
