On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Sumit Naiksatam <sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yair, The FWaaS tempest tests were not planned for H release. They are > planned for the current release (hence the blueprint) and some of us were > working towards them. This is also a standing discuss item this during the > the FWaaS sub team meetings. > > Thanks, > ~Sumit. > > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Salvatore Orlando <sorla...@nicira.com> > wrote: >> >> I reckon the decision of keeping neutron's firewall API out of gate tests >> was reasonable for the Havana release. >> I might be argued the other 'experimental' service, VPN, is already >> enabled on the gate, but that did not happen before proving the feature was >> reliable enough to not cause gate breakage. >> >> If we can confidently say the same for the firewall extension now, I would >> agree on enabling it on gate tests as well. >> >> Salvatore >> >> >> On 29 December 2013 22:22, Yair Fried <yfr...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> I'm trying to push a firewall api test [1] and I see it cannot run on the >>> current gate. >>> I was FWaaS is disabled since it broke the gate. >>> Does anyone knows if this is still an issue? >>> If so - how do we overcome this? >>> I would like to do some work on this service (scenarios) and don't want >>> to waste time if this is something that cannot be done right now >>> >>> Thank you >>> Yair >>> >>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/64362 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >
There was a change [0] proposed to enable q-fwaas in devstack-gate, but it also enabled the service on the Havana branch which is problematic because as I understand it adding extra neutron services to the Havana gate broke things [1] and fwaas isn't ready in Havana. If we want to enable this service we should only do so on the master branch (feel free to update that change I can restore it), or if I am mistaken about the state of things in the Havana gate let me know and we can restore that change as is. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60149/ [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48793/ Clark _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
