The github repo has a three clause BSD license file: https://github.com/tzangms/django-bootstrap-form
Not sure if that satisfies ftpmaster's needs. The lack of BSD license at the top of the file I would be happy to submit a pull request for if that would help. -Carl On 12/27/2013 12:29 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > bootstrap-form was rejected by the Debian FTP masters, and I have no > reply from upstream to fix the licensing. I'm not sure what to do next. > Any advice? Could we just stop using bootstrap-form? > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > P.S: Below is the reject message from the FTP masters, and my follow-up > with upstream authors, left unreplied for now 12 days. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Fwd: python-django-bootstrap-form_3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 11:30:23 +0800 > From: Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> > Organization: Debian > To: tzangms <tzan...@gmail.com>, Matt Austin > <matt.aus...@thecut.net.au>, Roberto Rosario > <roberto.rosario.gonza...@gmail.com>, PKG OpenStack > <openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > > Hi there, > > I'm a Debian Developer who takes care of OpenStack in Debian. Since > django-bootstrap-form is one of the (new) dependencies of OpenStack, I > tried to upload it to Debian Sid. Unfortunately, the package has been > rejected by the FTP masters on licensing issue. Below is a copy of the > reply from Paul Tagliamonte from the FTP master team. As you may know, > Debian takes licensing issues very seriously. > > What I would need you to address the issue, so that I can make another > upload attempt, is to: > > 1/ Add a LICENSE file sitting on the top level of your source code, > telling under which license your python module is released. > > 2/ Add some licensing headers in your source files, if possible all of > them. This isn't mandatory, but this is very much appreciated by the FTP > masters. > > Once this is done, please do a new release on PyPi. Additionally, it'd > be great if you could give me the URL of the git repository that matches > the latest release on PyPi, together with tags. It doesn't look like the > repository at https://github.com/tzangms/django-bootstrap-form has any > tags, which is annoying for me, as I prefer to use a git repository with > tags rather than the tarball from PyPi which includes egg-info (on the > packaging side of things, it's better that this is not present in > upstream source code as it is generated anyway). > > Please let me know when this is done, so that I can try to upload again > (hopefully with success this time) in Debian. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: python-django-bootstrap-form_3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED > Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:00:36 +0000 > From: Paul Richards Tagliamonte <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> > To: PKG OpenStack <openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Thomas > Goirand <z...@debian.org> > > > Howdy maintainer, > > Sorry, I've had to reject this package. The only license information is > in the setup.py, where it claims 'BSD'. There's no more information in the > docs site (or anywhere else I can see) as to what the actual terms are. > > In addition, this is also a BSD license violation to not include the license > with the source :) > > Cheers, > Paul > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
