On 10/17/2018 9:24 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
As you may know, unfortunately, Horizon doesn't support all features
provided by APIs. That's why we created feature gaps list [1].
I'd got a lot of great conversations with projects teams during the PTG
and we tried to figure out what should be done prioritize these tasks.
It's really helpful for Horizon to get feedback from other teams to
understand what features should be implemented next.
While I'm filling launchpad with new bugs and blueprints for [1], it
would be good to review this list again and find some volunteers to
decrease feature gaps.
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-feature-gap
Thanks everybody for any of your contributions to Horizon.
+openstack-sigs
+openstack-operators
I've left some notes for nova. This looks very similar to the compute
API OSC gap analysis I did [1]. Unfortunately it's hard to prioritize
what to really work on without some user/operator feedback - maybe we
can get the user work group involved in trying to help prioritize what
people really want that is missing from horizon, at least for compute?
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/compute-api-microversion-gap-in-osc
--
Thanks,
Matt
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
