On 2018-10-10 13:35:00 -0500 (-0500), Greg Hill wrote: [...] > We plan to still have a CI gatekeeper, probably Travis CI, to make sure PRs > past muster before being merged, so it's not like we're wanting to > circumvent good contribution practices by committing whatever to HEAD.
Travis CI has gained the ability to prevent you from merging changes which fail testing? Or do you mean something else when you refer to it as a "gatekeeper" here? > But the +2/+W rights thing was a huge PITA to deal with with so > few contributors, for sure. [...] Note that this is not a technical limitation at all, merely social convention. There are plenty of projects hosted on our infrastructure, some even official OpenStack projects, where contributor count is low enough that authors who are also core reviewers just review and approve their own changes for expediency. > There's also a sense that if a project is in the Openstack > umbrella, it's not useful outside Openstack, and Taskflow is > designed to be a general purpose library. [...] Be aware that the "OpenStack Infrastructure" is in the process of rebranding itself as "OpenDev" and we're working to eliminate mention of OpenStack on things that don't need it. This includes moving services to a new domain name, switching to other repository namespaces, putting mirroring to services like GitHub and Bitbucket under the direct control of teams who are interested in handling that with their own unique organizations in those platforms, and so on. It's progressing, though perhaps too slowly to solve your immediate concerns. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
