Oh, this does raise an interesting question... Should such information be reported by the projects up to users through labels? Something like, "percona_multimaster=safe" Its really difficult for folks to know which projects can and can not be used that way currently.
Is this a TC question? Thanks, Kevin ________________________________________ From: melanie witt [melwi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2018 10:35 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] add service discovery, proxysql, vault, fabio and FQDN endpoints On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:23:03 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: > That explains where the source of the problem comes from (it's the use > of SELECT FOR UPDATE, which has been removed from Nova's quota-handling > code in the Rocky release). Small correction, the SELECT FOR UPDATE was removed from Nova's quota-handling code in the Pike release. -melanie __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev