Thanks for the summary, Ildiko. I have some questions inline. On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, at 11:23 AM, Ildiko Vancsa wrote:
<snipped> > > We agreed to prefer federation for Keystone and came up with two work > items to cover missing functionality: > > * Keystone to trust a token from an ID Provider master and when the auth > method is called, perform an idempotent creation of the user, project > and role assignments according to the assertions made in the token This sounds like it is based on the customizations done at Oath, which to my recollection did not use the actual federation implementation in keystone due to its reliance on Athenz (I think?) as an identity manager. Something similar can be accomplished in standard keystone with the mapping API in keystone which can cause dynamic generation of a shadow user, project and role assignments. > * Keystone should support the creation of users and projects with > predictable UUIDs (eg.: hash of the name of the users and projects). > This greatly simplifies Image federation and telemetry gathering I was in and out of the room and don't recall this discussion exactly. We have historically pushed back hard against allowing setting a project ID via the API, though I can see predictable-but-not-settable as less problematic. One of the use cases from the past was being able to use the same token in different regions, which is problematic from a security perspective. Is that that idea here? Or could someone provide more details on why this is needed? Were there any volunteers to help write up specs and work on the implementations in keystone? <snipped> Colleen (cmurphy) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
