On 18-09-06 13:33:12, Michel Peterson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > > On 18-08-31 19:52:09, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > The requirements project has a co-installability test for the various > > > projects, networking-odl being included. > > > > > > Because of the way the dependancy on ceilometer is done it is blocking > > > all reviews and updates to the requirements project. > > > > > > http://logs.openstack.org/96/594496/2/check/requirements- > > integration/8378cd8/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-08-31_22_54_49_357505 > > > > The requirements team has gone ahead and made a aweful hack to get gate > > unwedged. The commit message is a very good summary of our reasoning > > why it has to be this way for now. My comment explains our plan going > > forward (there will be a revert prepared as soon as this merges for > > instance). > > > > step 1. merge this > > step 2. look into and possibly fix our tooling (why was the gitref > > addition not rejected by gate) > > step 3. fix networking-odl (release ceilometer) > > step 4. unmerge this > > > > I remember that before landing the problematic patch [1] there was some > discussion around it. Basically the problem was not n-odl but ceilometer > not being in pypi, but we never foresaw this problem. > > Now that the problem is so critical, the question is how can we, from the > n-odl team, help in fixing this? I am open to help in any effort that > involves n-odl or any other project. > > Sorry this message fell through the cracks and I didn't answer before. > > PS: I'm CCing Mike Kolesnik to this email, as he will be going to the PTG > and can represent n-odl. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/557370/
I think the best choice at this point in time would be to get a ceilometer release onto pypi. At that time you can move to using that version as your project minimum. Just make sure that if you need a new feature you ask them for a release instead of using a git SHA. I'll be at the PTG as well, infra/upgrade/OSA rooms mostly I think. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev