Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-08-01 09:58:03 -0500: > On 08/01/2018 08:38 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-08-01 09:58:48 -0300 (-0300), Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > >> What about Rocket chat instead of Slack? It is open source. > >> https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat > >> > >> Monty, what kind of evaluation would you guys need? I might be > >> able to help. > > > > Consider reading and possibly resurrecting the infra spec for it: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/319506 > > > > My main concern is how we'll go about authenticating and policing > > whatever gateway we set up. As soon as spammers and other abusers > > find out there's an open (or nearly so) proxy to a major IRC > > network, they'll use it to hide their origins from the IRC server > > operators and put us in the middle of the problem. > > To be clear -- I was not suggesting running matrix and IRC. I was > suggesting investigating running a matrix home server and the > permanently moving all openstack channels to it. > > matrix synapse supports federated identity providers with saml and cas > support implemented. I would imagine we'd want to configure it to > federate to openstackid for logging in to the home server -so that might > involve either adding saml support to openstackid or writing an > openid-connect driver to synapse. >
This matches my expectations. We did talk about supporting a temporary bridge to IRC, during the migration, but I don't think we need to run an "open" home server to have that. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev