On 26/06/18 09:12, Jay Pipes wrote:
Is (one of) the problem(s) with our community that we have too small of
a scope/footprint? No. Not in the slightest.
Incidentally, this is an interesting/amusing example of what we talked
about this morning on IRC[1]: you say your concern is that the scope of
*Nova* is too big and that you'd be happy to have *more* services in
OpenStack if they took the orchestration load off Nova and left it just
to handle the 'plumbing' part (which I agree with, while noting that
nobody knows how to get there from here); but here you're implying that
Kata Containers (something that will clearly have no effect either way
on the simplicity or otherwise of Nova) shouldn't be part of the
Foundation because it will take focus away from Nova/OpenStack.
So to answer your question:
<jaypipes> zaneb: yeah... nobody I know who argues for a small stable
core (in Nova) has ever said there should be fewer higher layer services.
<jaypipes> zaneb: I'm not entirely sure where you got that idea from.
I guess from all the people who keep saying it ;)
Apparently somebody was saying it a year ago too :D
https://twitter.com/zerobanana/status/883052105791156225
cheers,
Zane.
[1]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-06-26.log.html#t2018-06-26T15:30:33
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
