On Wed, Jun 20 2018, Bedyk, Witold wrote: Same as Gordon. You should maintain that in your own repo. There's just no bandwidth in Ceilometer right now for things like that. :(
> Hello Telemetry Team, > > any opinion on this? > > Best greetings > Witek > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bedyk, Witold <witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com> >> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 10:28 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][monasca] Monasca >> publisher for Ceilometer >> >> Hello Telemetry Team, >> >> We would like to contribute a Monasca publisher to Ceilometer project [1] >> and add it to the list of currently supported transports [2]. >> The goal of the plugin is to send Ceilometer samples to Monasca API. >> >> I understand Gordon's concerns about adding maintenance overhead for >> Ceilometer team which he expressed in review but the code is pretty much >> self-contained and does not affect Ceilometer core. It's not our intention to >> shift the maintenance effort and Monasca team should still be responsible >> for this code. >> >> Adding this plugin will help in terms of interoperability of both projects >> and >> can be useful for wider parts of the OpenStack community. >> >> Please let me know your thoughts. I hope we can get this code merged. >> >> Cheers >> Witek >> >> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/562400 >> [2] >> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/contributor/architecture.html >> #processing-the-data > -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info */
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
