Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-06-01 15:19:46 -0400: > On 01/06/18 12:18, Doug Hellmann wrote:
[snip] > > Is that rule a sign of a healthy team dynamic, that we would want > > to spread to the whole community? > > Yeah, this part I am pretty unsure about too. For some projects it > probably is. For others it may just be an unnecessary obstacle, although > I don't think it'd actually be *un*healthy for any project, assuming a > big enough and diverse enough team (which should be a goal for the whole > community). It feels like we would be saying that we don't trust 2 core reviewers from the same company to put the project's goals or priorities over their employer's. And that doesn't feel like an assumption I would want us to encourage through a tag meant to show the health of the project. Maybe I'm reading too much into it? Or it is more of a problem than I have experienced? Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
