I did a quick search for all the glyphs we are using: ~/dev/horizon(master)> ag 'fa-' | egrep -o 'fa-[a-z-]*' | sort | uniq fa- fa-angle-left fa-angle-right fa-arrow-down fa-arrow-up fa-asterisk fa-b fa-bars fa-bolt fa-bug fa-calculator fa-calendar fa-caret-down fa-caret-up fa-check fa-chevron-down fa-chevron-right fa-circle fa-close fa-cloud fa-cloud-upload fa-code fa-cog fa-desktop fa-download fa-exclamation fa-exclamation-circle fa-exclamation-triangle fa-eye fa-eye-slash fa-font-path fa-fw fa-group fa-home fa-icon fa-info-circle fa-lg fa-list-alt fa-lock fa-minus fa-pencil fa-plus fa-question-circle fa-refresh fa-save fa-search fa-server fa-share-square-o fa-sign-out fa-sort fa-spin fa-spinner fa-square fa-th fa-th-large fa-times fa-trash fa-unlock fa-upload fa-user fa-var-check-square-o fa-var-circle-o fa-var-dot-circle-o fa-var-sort fa-var-sort-asc fa-var-sort-desc fa-var-square-o fa-warning
The lone "fa-" comes from table actions, where the icon is defined in code, and pretty much anything can be used — since plugins can define their own actions with their own icons — but I don't think we use anything exotic there. On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Horizon team! > > I'm not sure if you're aware of that, but the upstream authors of > fontawesome decided it was a good idea to break everyone. See this > Debian bug entry: > > https://bugs.debian.org/899124 > > So, what happened is that fontawesome-webfont has been split into 3 sets > of fonts: solid, regular and brands fonts. Thus there is no drop in > replacement for the old fontawesome-webfont.xxx. > > As my python3-xstatic-font-awesome removes the embedded fonts, and just > points to /usr/share/fonts-font-awesome, Horizon is broken and cannot > even be installed currently in Debian Sid. Of course, I'm considering > reverting the removal of the data folder from the xstatic package, but > it then defeats the purpose of Xstatic, which is avoiding duplication of > static files already packaged in the distribution. > > So, ideally, I would like to know first if I can use the fa-solid-900 > for Horizon, or if other glyphs are in use (it's very much possible that > only fa-solid-900 stuff are in use, but I really don't know how to check > for that the correct way). If that's the case, then I can workaround the > issue (at least temporarily), and synlink stuff in the data folder to > the new fa-solid-900 files. > > Second, it'd be nice if Horizon could adapt and use the new v5 > font-awesome, so that the problem is completely solved. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
