On 5/23/2018 11:00 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
I have yet to see anyone suggest it should be prioritized over other work. I expect the extracted and proposed changes/specs corresponding to the divergence would be viewed on their own merits just like any other change and ignored, reviewed, rejected, et cetera as appropriate.
Rather than literally making this a priority, I expect most of the feeling is that because of the politics and pressure of competition with a fork in another foundation is driving the defensiveness about feeling pressured to prioritize review on whatever specs/patches are proposed as a result of the code dump.
-- Thanks, Matt __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
