On 2018-05-17 18:47:06 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 5/17/2018 5:23 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > Not to troll too hard here, but it's kind of frustrating to see that > > twitter trumps people actually proposing sessions on time and then > > having them be rejected. > > I reckon this is because there were already a pre-defined set of slots / > rooms for Forum sessions and we had fewer sessions proposed than reserved > slots, and that's why adding something in later is not a major issue?
Yes, as I understand it we still have some overflow space too if planned forum sessions need continuing. Session leaders have hopefully received details from the event planners on how to reserve additional space in such situations. As far as I'm aware no proposed Forum sessions were rejected this time around, and there was some discussion among members of the TC (in #openstack-tc[*]) before it was agreed there was room to squeeze this particular latecomer into the lineup. [*] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-05-14.log.html#t2018-05-14T17:27:05 -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
