On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw > tempurls. That is, there was no official support, but it still worked. > > In 3.2.0 (specifically the linked commit(s)) tempurls were validated to > require /v1/account/container/object, which does not work with radosgw > as it expects /v1/container/object. This means that radosgw tempurls > fail to work, which further means that radosgw will stop working for > things like ironic. > > I can see the point that swiftclient should not care about ceph not > fully implementing the swift spec and not supporting the radosgw url > syntax, but it seems like a step back. If this is not fixed then things > like ironic will not work with radosgw for Ocata and above (as that's > when this change was made). We'd need to wait for either ceph to fix > this and support the account part of the url (probably just dropping it) > or have people fork python-swiftclient to 'fix' it. > > I'm not sure what the right answer is... > Sounds like in the meantime ironic should pin python-swiftclient, yes? // jim
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev