Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/25/2018 4:07 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: >> Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule: >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing >> (also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by two >> members from UC, TC and Foundation. >> >> We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to >> create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed >> something. The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a >> major conflict in either content or speaker availability, please email >> speakersupp...@openstack.org. > > Two questions: > > 1. What does the yellow on the pre-emptible instances cell mean?
It was two sessions submitted after the deadline that the selection committee decided to keep. Were highlighted yellow so that they could find them. > 2. Just from looking at this, it looks like there were far fewer > submissions for forum topics than actual slots available, so basically > everything was approved (unless it was an obvious duplicate or not > appropriate for a forum session), is that right? Yes, there were less submissions, but they were all actually quite good. Encouraging teams to go through a round of brainstorming before submitting yields a lot less duplicates and crazy sessions. We also had ample space (3 parallel rooms for 4 days, with only one day of keynotes), more than we used to have. We decided to use the 3rd room as a room available to schedule follow-up sessions, in case 40 min does not cut it. More details on that later once the schedule is approved. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
