On 12/16/2013 03:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2013/16/12 14:03, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 12/13/2013 03:08 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote:
Horizoners,
As discussed in TripleO and Horizon meetings, we are proposing to move
Tuskar UI under the Horizon umbrella. Since we are building our UI
solution on top of Horizon, we think this is a good fit. It will allow
us to get feedback and reviews from the appropriate group of
developers.
I don't think, we really disagree here.
My main concern would be more: what do we get, if we make up another
project under the umbrella of horizon? I mean, what does that mean at
all?
My proposal would be, to send patches directly to horizon. As discussed
in last weeks horizon meeting, tuskar UI would become integrated in
Horizon, but disabled by default. This would enable a faster integration
in Horizon and would reduce the overhead of creating a separate
repositoy, installation instructions, packaging etc. etc.
From the horizon side: we would get some new contributors (and
hopefully
reviewers), which is very much appreciated.
Matthias
This is important note. From information architecture and user
interaction point of view, I don't think it makes sense to keep all
the three tabs visible together (Project, Admin, Infrastructure).
There are lot of reasons, but main points:
* Infrastructure itself is undercloud concept running in different
instance of Horizon.
* Users dealing with deployment and infrastructure management are not
the users of OpenStack UI / Dashboard. It is different set of users.
So it doesn't make sense to have giant application, which provides
each and every possible feature. I think we need to keep focused.
So by default, I would say that there should exist Project + Admin tab
together or Infrastructure. But never all three together. So when
Matthias say 'disabled by default', I would mean completely hidden for
user and if user wants to use Infrastructure management, he can enable
it in different horizon instance, but it will be the only visible tab
for him. So it will be sort of separate application, but still running
on top of Horizon.
-- Jarda
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks for pointing this out, In Horizon you can easily decide which
dashboards to show, so the Infrastructure management Horizon instance
can have Project and Admin dashboards disabled.
I think there has been discussed that some panels of Admin dashboard
should be required for infrastructure management. We can solve this by
adding those selected Admin panels also into Infrastructure dashboard.
Jirka
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
