On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:08 AM, iKhan <ik.ibadk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know if this is being planned in Icehouse, if not probably > proposing an approach will help. We have seen cinder-volume service > initialization part. Similarly if we can get our hands on child process > that are running under cinder-volume service, if we terminate those process > and restart them along with newly added backends. It might help us achieve > the target. > It's not in the plans [1][2]. Having the idea spec'd out in the wiki and setting an agenda item [3] for the next meeting can get things going though. [1] - https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-2 [2] - https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/icehouse-3 [3] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings -Mike Perez
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
