On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-03-16 21:22:51 +0000 (+0000), Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > [...] >> It seems mod_wsgi doesn't want python applications catching SIGHUP, >> as Apache expects to be able to catch that. By default, it even ensures >> signal handlers do not get registered.[0] > [...] >> Given we just had a goal to make all API services runnable as a WSGI >> application, it seems wrong to enable mutable config for API services. >> It's a super useful thing though, so I'd love to figure out a way we can do >> it. > [...] > > Given these are API services, can the APIs grow a (hopefully > standardized) method to trigger this in lieu of signal handling? Or > if the authentication requirements are too much, Zuul and friends > have grown RPC sockets which can be used to inject these sorts of > low-level commands over localhost to their service daemons (or could > probably also do similar things over UNIX sockets if you don't want > listeners on the loopback interface).
Throwing an idea out there, but maybe listening to file modification events using something like inotify could be a possibility? > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
